candlemaker74 Posted January 15, 2008 Share Posted January 15, 2008 Hi,I have a question that I think I know the answer too, but just want to make sure... The higher the FO load of the wax, the more sent throw cold and hot of the candle, correct?So, a wax with a 11% FO load is much better than a wax with a 6% FO load, correct?Thanks! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scent Cellar Posted January 15, 2008 Share Posted January 15, 2008 Wax is only part of the equation of candlemaking. If you choose a fragrance from a reputable company you will never need to load your wax to the hilt with f/o. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RobinInOR Posted January 15, 2008 Share Posted January 15, 2008 Nope. You may start running into problems with the wicking. Flames might drown out. I've had some fragrances where I had problems with the wicking - I bumped the amount of FO down and actually got better performance. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Karen B Posted January 15, 2008 Share Posted January 15, 2008 It can also just ruin the scent. I tested CC's Sultry Angel at 1oz per lb (even though supplier said way less) I just didn't like the scent. I went down to what she suggested with this FO and it was just a much nicer smelling scent. It wasn't any "lighter" just better. Test, test, test. This is a very expensive hobby.Karen B Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SatinDucky Posted January 15, 2008 Share Posted January 15, 2008 Back to the old saying... more is not always better Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CareBear Posted January 15, 2008 Share Posted January 15, 2008 oooh... but bigger is Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blazerina Posted January 15, 2008 Share Posted January 15, 2008 CareBear just keeps rubbing it in.:rolleyes2 back at ya. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeavenScentU Posted January 15, 2008 Share Posted January 15, 2008 Do you have a type of wax that requires 11% FO load? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darbla Posted January 15, 2008 Share Posted January 15, 2008 What she may be asking is would a wax rated with a FO load of 11% throw better in general, even with less FO. Not should she load it to the max. Which if that's the case, the answer is probably no because we'd all be buying it if such existed. Unless it costed even more $$$ than what we're paying already.Darbla Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ring of Fire Posted January 16, 2008 Share Posted January 16, 2008 Depends on the wax. Are you using the paraffin sludge, or the killer of bees beeswax or that soy stuff which comes from God knows where? Which one is it that kills orangutans? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tereasa Posted January 16, 2008 Share Posted January 16, 2008 I've started mixing all three, ROF, because I'd hate to be accused of wax racism... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
candlemaker74 Posted January 16, 2008 Author Share Posted January 16, 2008 What she may be asking is would a wax rated with a FO load of 11% throw better in general, even with less FO. Not should she load it to the max. DarblaYes, that is somewhat what I am asking...Generally, does a wax rated with a max FO load of 11% throw better than a wax rated with a 6% max FO load?In other words a wax that can take a max 11% FO and has 11% FO would have a better throw than a wax that can take a 6% max load and has 6% FO...? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stella1952 Posted January 16, 2008 Share Posted January 16, 2008 Which one is it that kills orangutans?That would be palm wax.I say kill 'em all and let god sort 'em out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stella1952 Posted January 16, 2008 Share Posted January 16, 2008 Candlemaker74, have you made any candles yet? It's much easier to address specific problems rather than general "what ifs"... The only answer to the question you posed would be "that depends..." Then if one asked, "depends on what"the answer would be "a LOT of variables"See what I mean? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mountain_Annie Posted January 19, 2008 Share Posted January 19, 2008 Candlemaker, Yes....of course you'd get a better throw with a wax that (#1) holds more FO... and (#2) to which more FO is added. Mt AnnieGenerally, does a wax rated with a max FO load of 11% throw better than a wax rated with a 6% max FO load?In other words a wax that can take a max 11% FO and has 11% FO would have a better throw than a wax that can take a 6% max load and has 6% FO...? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oceangazer1 Posted January 20, 2008 Share Posted January 20, 2008 Depends on the wax. Are you using the paraffin sludge, or the killer of bees beeswax or that soy stuff which comes from God knows where? Which one is it that kills orangutans? LOL where is my sludge man anyway? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dolphin146 Posted January 21, 2008 Share Posted January 21, 2008 LOL where is my sludge man anyway? Speaking of sludge. I'm waiting for the UPS guy to deliver my sludge. Regina Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mizbizzyb Posted January 30, 2008 Share Posted January 30, 2008 Candlemaker, Yes....of course you'd get a better throw with a wax that (#1) holds more FO... and (#2) to which more FO is added. Mt AnnieNot necessarily true. Some fos will throw better at a lower rate than a higher one. But maybe that is depending on the quality of the oil. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mountain_Annie Posted January 30, 2008 Share Posted January 30, 2008 Not necessarily true. Some fos will throw better at a lower rate than a higher one. But maybe that is depending on the quality of the oil.You're right mizbizzy. I was speaking more "in general" but yes the outcome will always vary depending on many different factors. Too much FO is much worse than not enough. Mt Annie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TxSioux Posted January 30, 2008 Share Posted January 30, 2008 I'm w/ Bizzy on this one. It took MANY yrs for this to sink in my thick skull, but pulling down the fo load actually gave me a far better throw than trying to max it out. So, just because a wax CAN hold 11%, doesn't mean you'll get the best results if you do. I look at fo loads kinda like a Victoria's Secret catalog ... just cause they offer super skimpy short shorts in any size larger than a 0, doesn't mean you'll get the best results when you max them out!!Susan. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tereasa Posted January 30, 2008 Share Posted January 30, 2008 do I need to do the wax is a sponge speech, or shall I assume that all of us know that?maybe not...the percentage load is given by the manufacturer because that's the maximum FO that a particular wax will hold before becoming saturated. Going back to my chemistry days, once something is saturated, and you add more of (OMG... is it solute? I think so, cuz the liquid part is solvent, right?), in this case, FO... the wax won't be able to hold it and it 'leaks out'. This leads to excessive smoking, sooting, costly, etc. etc.Now, as to a wax that holds 12% vs. a wax that holds 6%... both waxes can throw equally. It just depends on wicks, containers, quality of FO, and many, many, many other factors. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kat88 Posted January 30, 2008 Share Posted January 30, 2008 I'm w/ Bizzy on this one. It took MANY yrs for this to sink in my thick skull, but pulling down the fo load actually gave me a far better throw than trying to max it out. So, just because a wax CAN hold 11%, doesn't mean you'll get the best results if you do. I look at fo loads kinda like a Victoria's Secret catalog ... just cause they offer super skimpy short shorts in any size larger than a 0, doesn't mean you'll get the best results when you max them out!!Susan.Susan,I love your Victoria's Secret analogy! I recently made a batch for my personal use/liking using only 3/4 tsp of CSN Moon Lake Musk just to see what happened. I arrived at 3/4 tsp because it had a very nice light scent while mixing in the wax - Yes, I do know this is not necessarily the best/correct way to figure FO amounts but, hey, ya never know until ya try it. Actually, these candles had a wonderful light scent that filled both my living room and kitchen! I was very pleasantly surprised at the CT & HT at this low amount of FO but it worked in this case! I've made other batches with the same wax & FO but at larger amounts FO and did not achieve the quality CT & HT that the lower amount did. I also adjusted the temp at which I added FO which, actually, may have been the reason for increased CT & HT in this case. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.