Jump to content

Tin Wicking (Question for Top also if around)


Recommended Posts

Using eco cb-135 (not advanced) and starting to test tins with it. If you use a similar type soy (soy/cottonseed, soy, advanced-type soy - but not parasoys), care to share wick starting points for 4, 6, or 8oz tins?

Does anyone think that the cored wicks (i.e. hemp, cotton, zinc) would be better in them than coreless since tins mainly go to all liquid at the end? I assume ECOs would be good also though.

I've been doing a lot of searching and found some good info, however, Top, if you are around there are 2 conflicting pieces of info from you on two posts that maybe you can clear up. http://www.candletech.com/forums/showthread.php?t=8013#19 says eco 14 with ecosoya cb-135 in an 8oz. tin while http://www.candletech.com/forums/showthread.php?t=14935#6 says it was C-3 in the same size, same wick. Just confused on which wax you were testing - seems like you meant cb-135 and not c-3 as posted.

TIA, for ANY help for starting points!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Henry!

I'm using the Advanced, but this since you have so much experience withthem both, thought this may help even as a starting point. I'm using the 6oz tin from SKS (they have a great one with tiny feet on the bottom), 2.75" diameter. I'm using a CD-10. The CD-8's were baby-flaming. Works great with all my FO's, even the heavier ones, and I've never had a wick topple over, even when the candle is completely liquid. A couple years ago I was using the CB135. I'm guessing I would start with the CD-12 with that wax. May not be of any help!

Gretchen

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Henryk, all this time I was recalling testing C3 with ECO 14 and posting it. Looking back at the thread it was apparently CB-135. Maybe I got confused because I never ended up using ECO 14 for the typical 8 oz tin of CB-135. More like ECO 10 or 12 I think. For 6 oz tins it was ECO 6 or 8.

The most notable thing about wicking tins is how much heat the metal transmits from the bottom back up the sides. If you go for maximum scent throw at the top and wick them for a full melt pool, you get an inferno when you burn down to the bottom. I do these conservatively and allow for a fair amount of hangup at the top of the container. Past the halfway point they start to catch up like crazy.

Good luck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Henryk, all this time I was recalling testing C3 with ECO 14 and posting it. Looking back at the thread it was apparently CB-135. Maybe I got confused because I never ended up using ECO 14 for the typical 8 oz tin of CB-135. More like ECO 10 or 12 I think. For 6 oz tins it was ECO 6 or 8.

The most notable thing about wicking tins is how much heat the metal transmits from the bottom back up the sides. If you go for maximum scent throw at the top and wick them for a full melt pool, you get an inferno when you burn down to the bottom. I do these conservatively and allow for a fair amount of hangup at the top of the container. Past the halfway point they start to catch up like crazy.

Good luck.

I agree and have learned to live with the initial hang up in the tins.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Henryk, all this time I was recalling testing C3 with ECO 14 and posting it. Looking back at the thread it was apparently CB-135. Maybe I got confused because I never ended up using ECO 14 for the typical 8 oz tin of CB-135. More like ECO 10 or 12 I think. For 6 oz tins it was ECO 6 or 8.

The most notable thing about wicking tins is how much heat the metal transmits from the bottom back up the sides. If you go for maximum scent throw at the top and wick them for a full melt pool, you get an inferno when you burn down to the bottom. I do these conservatively and allow for a fair amount of hangup at the top of the container. Past the halfway point they start to catch up like crazy.

Good luck.

Perfect. One of the other 6 oz. containers I did I guess with an ECO 8. The other I probably really overwicked - HTP104. I don't know what I was thinking of. We'll see how it goes.

Regarding your second paragraph - even with the little bit of testing I did before with 70/30 in a 4 oz. tin - that was DEFINATELY the case - you have to burn them all the way down. No cheating.

:grin2:

PS: mptex - thanks for the hint on the cotton!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought that was basically the vanilla-type FOs - not sure about the other ones.

I'll give an update later on things - but I can say I'm pretty discouraged as to how they set up - even though I used USA. I'm starting to think with the 135 that the FO really has a lot to do with how things set up. Its almost like I didn't use any additive at all this time - yet with some other FOs I had great looking set ups post burn.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm starting to think with the 135 that the FO really has a lot to do with how things set up.
Interesting observation. I found a small proportion of FOs that I couldn't even make a proper looking candle with using CB-135. The majority worked fine, but those few always set up screwy no matter what, even on the initial pour. I wrote them off as "incompatible".

By the way, all the old testers that I put away in the closet have a powdery looking mottled surface now and the wax has swelled so that all my 1/4" wicks are now 1/8".

Burn them when they're young...it's all downhill from there!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Henry..

Ive been testing the 4 and 8 oz tins and the 70/30. ..So far the best 2 Ive seen for the 4oz , for me, is 104 and 51-32-18 ....They both were fantastic.

Im having a hard time with the 8oz tho ( with 70/30 ) ....Ive kinda sat them back for a while and want to keep on with the 4oz til perfect....When you said this : Regarding your second paragraph - even with the little bit of testing I did before with 70/30 in a 4 oz. tin - that was DEFINATELY the case "

What did you end up wicking with on the 4oz and 70/30 ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's a pic after a few 3 hour burns (about 18 hours total). The ECO8 (middle) worked perfectly. The other two will probably catch up on the last burn or two - just a thicker film on those. (CD12 and HTP104)

I also liked how the ECO and the HTP had basically NO mushrooming in this test.

post-98-139458408478_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...