Jump to content

rjdaines

Registered Users Plus
  • Posts

    1,383
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by rjdaines

  1. The wick numbering systems has no meaning other than to differentiate one from another. In general, a larger numbered wick will have a higher ROC (rate of consumption), flame height, and pool size than a smaller numbered wick of the same type. It is not always true and you should download a table properties of the wick you use. Try this site for example: http://www.wicksunlimited.com/default.htm

    While the data is for a specific wax and usually not what you use (or me), the data does allow you to get a feel as to how the wicks will react.

    As a mentioned, a larger number may not always mean that the wick is larger than the previous one.

  2. What Vicky said is so true, the customer response can be the entire spectrum and you have very little control on how they use the product. For melts, there are many devices that are available for heating; bulbs, hot plates, lamps, and tealights. All will produce a different affect.

    Pick quality waxes and FOs, follow recommended procedures and you will have a good product. Work from there.

  3. OK, here are two more pics, the tins are on their 4th burn now and one was a fairly long one during Christmas Day. The left-hand tin has a CD-8 wick and the right a HTP-83. Because of the angle at which the photo was taken, the flames appear smaller than they actually were, that said, the HTP had a smaller flame and was not acceptable to me. Both had very good melt pools and the HT from both candles was very good but I liked the HTP better as there was less of a burned wax smell. HT is all about the melt pool. Mushrooming was also more prevalent with the HTP most likely because it was the cooler of the two wicks. I may run another test with a larger HTP wick and an Eco.

    The tins were never too hot to pick up and move around.

    The second pic shows the tops when cool.

    For home use, I am not a fan of tins because you don't see much of the flame for get a nice glow as you do with glass containers. However, they make a great traveling candle and can be used in places where glass is not appropriate.

    post-13162-139458516776_thumb.jpg

    post-13162-139458516782_thumb.jpg

  4. I am developing an aromatherapy line of candles and Lavender will be one of them. I'm not wanting to get into the discussion of FO vs EO and their therapeutic values but I think it's mostly how the user relates to the fragrances. The lavender FO for Candle Science is very good with both CT and HT, it was a big seller for me this fall. When researching FO vs. EO the impression I got was that EOs where great but didn't have the lifespan of FOs. So, going with straight EOs may not produce the best candle. On the other hand, many candle FOs do contain both FO and EO which, to me, is the best of both worlds.

    Others who work with EOs hopefully will add their experience to this thread.

  5. Just keep in mind that no one can explain what "curing" is and not all of us believe that is makes much difference. That said one should wait a period of time for the wax (paraffin or soy) to completely cool and harden. The exact time for this depends on the size of the candle. People typically wait 24 to 48 hours for paraffin and up to a week with soy. For testing purposes, soy candles can be tested sooner that 7 days. As mentioned above, if you have to wait weeks for an FO to "cure", is it really worth it unless it's for personal use.

  6. It's not unreasonable to assume that there may be variations in soy wax based on the quality of the soy bean harvest of any given year. I have no idea what the manufacturers do to account for this other than adding in more additives. The quality control characteristics for a lot must have a specific target range as well and so long as a lot falls within that range it's good to sell.

    Just my ideas on the subject.

    Reading the description of 464 it says soy wax and soy-based additives

×
×
  • Create New...