Hmm... even if this were to hold true, Xaipre, not all honeys are equal. All honeys have a certain degree of peroxidal activity, but these vary widely from honey to honey depending on the pollen source, and only certain honeys are certified to have anti-bacterial properties that are non-peroxidal, hence the "active" manuka honeys (which cost a bomb, by the way). The amount of honey (as a sole preservative) you'd need to preserve your original product (depending on the complexity) would probably be impractical, let alone the amount needed to counter further contamination (dirty fingers and unpurified water, etc). In addition to that, there is also the risk that the honey has been tampered with (additional sugars, etc). As to the good vs. bad bacteria, it's true yes, that not all bacteria is bad. We do need a certain amount of good bacteria to function properly, but the potentially devastating consequences of breeding bad bacteria outweighs the benefits of keeping the good bacteria by far. Honey as a preservative for complicated bath and body products is untried, untested and unverified. Synthetic preservatives aren't even 100% as is (goat's milk, anyone?). I wouldn't risk it. Maybe one day, if like you say, there's adequate testing and such. Until then, I'm not going to court a lawsuit with it