Jump to content

Sponiebr

Gold Member
  • Posts

    961
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    17

Posts posted by Sponiebr

  1. WHOA MULE! WHOA MULE!!! WHOA!!!!!! Aw, come on, WHOA!!!!! 
    WHOA MULE.jpg

    STAHP!!!!

     

    Hammer time!

    So I, or the local chapter of rabid crack crazed squirrels in my head, came up with this thought: (and I quote) 

    "Huh... That Hot Process ain't really all that hot... It's not at boiling. Boiling is 212F and that's 180F and that gets knocked down to 15o's when you add the slop...  Huh... there isn't any lye active when you throw in that live cultured yogurt and honey... What if there's Strep. Therm. in there?  Shouldn't you might be considering some Optiphen? There's tons of lacterbacter sugars... If they survive the heat somehow they're just gonna keep Sh*(edited)ing lactic acid... That won't be good. You need to KILL them all, and make sure they're dead. Leave no spore or bacter alive."  

    Once they got into talking about germicide. I just got the hell out of there, it was beyond creepy...  

    So... uh, DO I need a preservative? 

    I don't have any doubt that the bacteria is dead from the heat, and I doubt I have any hyperthermophiles in there, but there are lot's of "bacter and fungus" snacks in that soap.  I'm on the fence about it because I do this in CP and don't need a preservative. BUT on the other hand in CP the alkaline environment keeps things nice and sterile and also eats some of the free sugars. In HP, anything at the end of the cook is just there, but there is the heat and the heat can denature some of those components...

    Penny for your thoughts? 

     

    Sponiebr wrangler of the crack-crazed, rabid, germicidal squirrel infiltration.  


    HEY PENNY!!! Hurry up and get in here they're about to start!

    Penny taking notes.jpg 
     

  2. 5 hours ago, TallTayl said:

    I am one of those who can smell dirty pig yard as soon as it hits the lye solution with every single factory farmed brand of lard. "Leaf lard" is a slightly different story. It is the super flaky white fat taken from around the kidneys. That is not what is sold retail in tubs or bars, though. 

     

    The Off-putting smell is enhanced with heat (your HP brings it out the worst). Good new is The stink mostly does go away with curing, sponiebr. Though I confess I can sometimes smell it in well cured bars when they are wet in use. 

     

    For HP lard is a very good choice even without fancy recipes or techniques as it takes forever and a year to trace. You might find a much shorter cook time (long before the typical Vaseline) might be best. It will pour much like a well traced CP.

    Oh thank heaven's I'm not the only one that can smell that. I'm using Armour Brand Lard, it's just everywhere down here in Florida. Green, White, and red tubs or 4 gal paint bucket. About 1/2 the time it's labeled in Spanish as Manteca. (actually I'm pretty sure it's on both sides of the container...) 

    Gotta love Walmart! 

    download.jpg

    It DID take a while to get to trace, almost 10 minutes, which is a long time in HP for me. I might try another batch tonight, as I really need to suss out a OHM soap for fast production. Of anything I have made, the OHM is what I get asked about. 

    OHM SOAP YEAH BABY meme.jpg
     

     

  3. So, I haven't had a ton of time to actually "play" with soap making, because, y'know Christmas and doing "purposeful" soaps that would make nice gifts et cetera... 

     

    But I got to "play" with some soap making last night, or whenever Monday night into Tuesday morning was... 

     

    I made a 500g  test batch with the HTFHP and used:
    Lard 51%

    CO 76F 22%

    Canola 20%

    Castor 5%

    Beeswax (refined) 2%

    30% water:oil (more on this later)  
     

    Replaced ALL of the water with Aloe vera juice. 

    AFTER COOK:
    2 tbls warm yogurt dissolved in 40 g aloe juice to bring total water content up to 38% water:oil.
    1 tbls honey 
    1 tbls (LEVEL 1 tbps ppo) oat flour into the aloe/honey/yogurt slop.

    No FO's calculated in as well this was basically a OHM formulation and, as we all know, that needs no scent help.

    Oh, did I mention I was using lard? I HATE THE SMELL OF LARD.

    So lard and me have a serious hate (love... naw... I just hate the stuff.)  When I quit smoking and drinking somehow I got a sense of smell back that is pretty precise, to the point of being able to dissect recipes and FO's if I know what the smells are. All I smell with hot lard is pig manure, and it's GAGINGLY strong to me. Finished soap with lard has a similar odor, but more like cooked bacon... It's hard to describe, but it is so unique to me that I can smell it even when a soap has FO's.

    Still, I used the lard, and I opened the place up until I got it to "cook" in the lye long enough to get rid of the manure smell.
    The cook went just fine but I realized I wasn't going to be able to deal with the unscented bars, and because I had limited amounts of CS' FO's available in little 1oz testers I kinda had to pick and blend to make something that I thought would be "honey-esque". More on that in a minute. 
     

    So the idea behind the 30% water was to cook the soap with the high temp fluid HP method until it came down to the wire and was needing to do that last little rest and loosen up phase before the pour. I calculated the formulation to use 30% water:oil and targeted 38% water to oils as my final pour ratio. It WORKED. It was a little batter like, but as a general rule it worked and it worked well. I might increase the yogurt /or the honey a tad, but this worked well. It produced a very creamy off white soap that with the FO blend was to be "acceptablely honey-esque". I wasn't prepared for what happened today when I cut the bloody loaf.

    It should not surprise any of you that have been reading my posts for a while, that I have little voices in my head giving me moral and practical wisdom on how to avoid the fires of hell and/or an untimely death via bizarre circumstances... It should also not surprise any of my devoted folowee's that SOMETIMES I don't actually EMPLOY all of those moral/practical directions... o.O (don't judge me)
    Last night I had another one of those whiny little creeps nagging me inside my head, droning on about "hey you might want to record some of these particulars, you know 'cause you might want to (mufgfsjkklee)..." I cut the pesky little creep off, gagged it, and threw it back into it's demented little cage in the back of my mind. I was then free to proceed blissfully unencumbered by the pedantic nagging whine of "oh... you my want to write that down.. ohyoumighwanna"  (ugh) What a nightmare! Can't you see I'm CREATING!!!!??? Lemmealone!!! ---Dammit!

    So today at cut the smell that came off of that little loaf of mostly lard soap was, for lack of a better term: knee-buckling... I was SHOCKED!!! All I was trying to do was get a honey like scent from a couple of Candle Science FO'S! All I had used was Holly Berry and Snickerdoodle! That's IT!!! 

    I was NOT expecting to have created the absolute of a child's pure hope for Santa Claus on Christmas morning. The scent was DIVINE! I'm still pretty amazed at the stuff. It's somewhere between warm honey dipped graham crackers and Heaven's version of Gingerbread and masala chai (made with cream). It's AHMAZING!!!     

    There's one problem: I didn't write down my amounts or the ratios for the FO blend. :/ I roughly remember that it was more holly berry than snickerdoodle, or at least that's what I had intended it to be. Practically it was probably 60/40 holly berry to snickerdoodle and maybe 1/2 - 3/4 tsp. PPO.

    I guess that gimpy pedantic disembodied nagging voice was right, but don't tell him that... He's already enough of a PITA jerk, he doesn't need self righteousness to "round his complex out".

    Cheers,

     

    Sponiebr the executor of the super max for creepy, pedantic, disembodied, whiny, nagging, know-it-all-voices inside my head... o.O
    Oh, and they say "hey y'all"....

     

    15626059_10157901804485263_6358327272357735582_o.jpg    

    • Like 1
  4. 10 hours ago, Jcandleattic said:

    Not to mention that your average consumer is not going to know what "unsaponified" even means. When you try to explain it in laymen's terms they think they are washing with oil. Which is not a huge seller when you are trying to get people clean, not slick. LMAO kwim? 

    Yeah but I can't say the "F" word on my soap, much less SUPER "F" word... They'd burn me at the stake! I'll take your advice and skip the whole Super "F" word issue... Somebody also mentioned in "that-other-place-which-was-no-more-but-now-again-is" that if I want to sell by weight that I have to have my scales certified by the State. I know something about scale certification due to my work, but I mean DAMN!? Really!? In order to get hard cured soap that isn't going to have any moister evaporating off i'll have to have a BUTT TON of soap on the racks at any particular time, just curing... I could price it by the bar, but then I'd have to have a surefire weigh (there's a double entendre in there I promise), to cut the bars EXACTLY the same and also be able to mold them, and have them end up finished exactly the same... Selling by weight seems easier. 

    You know what... As cheap a bastard as I am... (yep! Cheap bastard, and HOW! ) I really need to go ahead and get those books by Gale on labeling and GMP, because the death doom and destruction in this selling soap labyrinth is just palpable.  (shudders) 

     

     

     

    Sponiebr the Cheap Bastard

  5. 5 hours ago, Jcandleattic said:

    Take out the "10% Unsaponified Oils Content"  and you'll be good. If you put that, you have to put which oil(s) it is that's unsaponified and if it's CP you won't know, and if you list 1 oil, you have to list all oils, which will then lead you to having to list all ingredients in correct order. Which then defeats the purpose of just calling it soap. Also if you make any cosmetic claims at all, either verbally or on the label, then you have to list ingredients. 

    Thanks J! I really appreciate the help. I do NOT want to go pissing off the Feudal Demagoguery Administration.  As I said these are going out to friends and family as Christmas gifts, so I'm not relabeling them, but I will take the SF % off the labels in my template. 

     

    19 hours ago, TallTayl said:

    Confused. Did you even look at Pinterest for their thousands of simple, attractive options?


    So I goes over to them Pinterest and hey! my soap on a string idea is there! Not only that but a sudsy friend of mine posted a picture of her soaps that she just got done wrapping and she had some of those soaps on a string! GMTA!!! 

    I think I'm in love with the concept of a small paper bag with the end folded over and closed with a string. That just seems so fast and breathable and just generally a good idea, and because I like the idea it's probably going to cause the soap to develop toxins not normally found on Earth...(Shrugs, I'm just used to it by now.)

    Slainte,

     

    Sponiebr 
     

  6. 9 hours ago, Jcandleattic said:

    Are you selling? If you are, and are going to label your soap, you need to follow the regulations for labeling soap, otherwise if you decide not to label, you can just call your soap, soap. 

    These are just the Christmas presents, but... now that you mention it... I was going, (for the time being), with the "it's soap" and "calling it soap" loophole and skipping the ingredients thing for right now. Are those labels shown above not good to that end? 

  7. 4 minutes ago, TallTayl said:

    Jump over to Pinterest for packaging ideas. Simple is best!

    OH HELL!!! I JUST HAD THE BEST IDEA THAT THE EXECUTOR... NEVER MIND!!!! I GOT THIS! 

     

    Get this: 

     

    Plug a hole in the soap bar, and run a string with a tag through the hole!!! Oh this is SO GOOD! Low impact, low cost, easy to do, fast, comes with a hanger loop for displaying on a peg board. THIS IS AWESOME!

    Thank you for inspiring me TT! 



    Sponiebr 

  8. This is by no means all of it but this is what I have wrapped thus far. I think I want to outsource soap wrapping... There's a Disher here that sells cuts straight off the log,

    I would like to consider this... "Thank you so much for your purchase of (glitch). Here's your soap in a brown paper bag.  There is a card in the bag denoting the soap specifications. Have a wonderful day and I hope you really enjoy your soap!  :D" BZZZZZZT:  Thank you so much for your purchase of (glitch). Here's your soap in a brown paper bag.  There is a card in the bag denoting the soap specifications. Have a wonderful day and I hope you really enjoy your soap!  :D"

    Those oval ones are a flat out PITA. they are wrapped in wax paper under the tissue paper. 

     

    20161215_082711.jpg

     

     

    20161215_082804.jpg

     

     

    20161215_082736.jpg

     

    20161215_082849.jpg

     

    Sponiebr the Outsourcer of... (things he don't like to do... ) 

     

  9. 4 hours ago, sra5027 said:

    Hello All,

    I am looking for colored matte containers for soy candles either made of glass or concrete.  I found really nice ones on Luxury Candle Supplies (https://luxurycandlesupplies.com.au/product/small-matte-black-vogue/) but since I live in the US and they're shipped from Australia, the shipping cost is outrageously expensive. 

     

    like this mebbe? I just found it... I have no experience with the company: http://www.grand-wholesale.com/product/mugs-without-handles-4733.htm

  10. 5 hours ago, Scented said:

    If I make a candle to test, it's going to be tested and not just lit for an hour and called good. If it needs another wick, I'll dig out the wick, replace it and possibly cut off the used portion. I make pillars so I'd rather have a level candle to start than create a bulge. However, if I'm testing and suspect that I will have a wick problem, I will pour more than one tester. 

    Since I don't make solid colored candles if I can help it, reusing the wax a second time gets tricky. I've done it. I've not had anything suffer from reuse except the time it took me to split the wax apart. Any more, I'll toss leftover wax together with other scented wax and remelt it into some other fragrance. Again, there's not much that suffers unless I store it in something that will suck the scent out of it. 

    Are you asking or presuming that recycled wax can't be used a second time for testing? Why can't it? There's no reason it can't be reused unless it's too dirty or you scorch it or alter its structure somehow etc. I don't know of any wax that can't be reused. 

    Uh, just out of curiosity, is there a way to actually "clean" the wax of FO and dye? I would think some sort of molecular filter maybe? But maybe just some sort of absorbent and a centrifuge? Like I said, I'm just ask'n out of curiosity but some of this in an extrapolated way is fairly useful to my life.  

  11. 7 hours ago, TallTayl said:

    All I can say is test with very small batches first. Soaping micas are treated with ingredients to help them remain stable at high pH. it will be very easy to blow through a lot of money trying to cut corners and save a buck. 

    I'm about to gear up for a "fast batch" aka a HP batch... I add my mica, and well... everything... at the end of the cook on HP right? These shimmer thangs... I can't really use them in my regular batches because of the FD&C coloring and the Lake dyes, but I can certainly make up a few test batches for the sake of seeing how they perform. I can also use them in batches that I know the end user isn't going to die from touching the soap.

    Am I being overly cautious? Probably. But I always say "Better completely inanimate and in your safe zone than not being completely inanimate and in your safe zone."  Oh and "We can dance if we want to..."  

     

  12. o.O 

     

    I was at the Dollar Tree tonight buying my month's worth of groceries and I was looking for wrapping ideas and... blah... blah...blah... Long story short: I ended up looking over in cosmetics and found L.A. Colors "SHIMMERING LOOSE EYESHADOW with BRUSH APPLICATOR". Whadda-ell  is THIS? Fast FORWARDED abridged version: it's 2.5 g of mineral, FD&C, and Lake dyed cosmetic eye and lip safe Mica. For $1. That's a little expensive at the ounce rate but if you just need a quick fix for topping or (I'm going to try some in a batch) then that's pretty darned convenient.  There's mineral oil and some other sticky stuff in the comp but not enough to be of any real concern, I don't think...

    Here's L.A. Colors' website showing the product I bought, and their link showing their vendors is below it. Thort I'd pass this lil find along to those who need it most. Chandler's might benefit from this as well...

    https://www.lacolors.com/Shimmering-Loose-Eyeshadow-1146.html

     

    https://www.lacolors.com/location.php

     

    Slainte,

     

    Sponiebr 

    • Like 2
  13. 1 hour ago, Jcandleattic said:

    You wait until after saponification is complete. I don't "lick" the soap. I wet my finger, rub it on the soap, then touch it to my tongue. If it zaps, lye heavy, if not, neutral. A lot of times, as long as it's not lye heavy by a LOT then I just wait a few days and test again. It usually just takes longer to saponify completely if I get a spot here or there. 

     

    Honestly after so many years of soapmaking, I don't tongue test hardly any of my soaps anymore. The only time I do is if they look "off" or like something is not quite right. A lot of times it's just a FO pocket, but you just never know... 

    Wait a sec! YOU DON'T actually LICK your soap!?!?!   I mean I do... I lick my soap from time to time... (Don't judge me...) Does that make me a bad person? (gawd... NOW I feel dirty...)  

    Zap testing is my standard for checking CP and that's just FINE for CP.  I was just wondering about the testing equipment because, gosh, with that High Temp HP stuff I can't tell if the burning and blisters in my mouth are from the lye or just from the heat of the hot soap...  I want to be accurate y'know! If I have to keep zap testing boiling hot soap with my body parts, so be it... But, I dunno... I thought I'd at least ASK if there was a easier, softer way... 

  14. 7 hours ago, Jcandleattic said:

    Well, since there is no oxygen in space, it does stand to reason that they wouldn't burn very well there, or be a good source of light or heat... 

     

    wthomas57's comment is pretty funny. 

    Beat me to it! 
     

    2 hours ago, Jcandleattic said:

    No, I completely agree with you. It's ridiculous what they spend money on. I'm not saying that no good is being done, it is, but things like toilet seat covers, and the like.. It's irritating. 

    Well, apparently... ONE of the many things that have been found out to not work well in micro gravity environments is getting pregnant... Apparently this has been extensively tested in space, and found to be EXTREMELY difficult to almost impossible to become pregnant in space. The fertilization process apparently needs gravity to facilitate the movement of stuff from point A to point B. Now THAT PISSES ME OFF! 

    Seriously NASA, you're a bunch of Bass turds! YOU PAID THESE PEOPLE WITH OUR TAX MONEY!!!! 

     

    I MEAN Jeeze!!! I would have TOTALLY done it for FREE!!!!

     -Sponiebr 

     

    • Like 1
  15. I really have no idea where else to ask this so I'll ask it here, because "I, I, I, oh here I stand before me..." (somebody might get that reference, but I doubt they'll admit it... )

     

    So, are all y'all doing pH testing and if (yes, I used "if"), so what are you using? Tester? Reagent solution? Strips? Bits of lichen off of rocks? The old drop-on-the-wrist-and-see-if-it-smokes? 

     

    Cheers, 

    Sponiebr the ______________  (meh, get creative and fill in the blank)

  16. Did I reply to this already or did my post never make it off my laptop? Well, just in case... I did... I'll reverbatize my responceification... 

     

    7 hours ago, TallTayl said:

    I tried those methods when they first came out with all the fanfare. Ever notice how you never see those bars photographed after the original photo shoot right from the cutter? 

     

    Several other seasoned soap soap makers joined me trying to figure out the appeal. A month later we were all still confuzzled about why this was so popular. Shrunken head soap is not pretty.


    Really? Do they shrink up that badly? I made my last batch at 40% water and after the cook and the evaporation and all I suspect that my end % was somewhere in the 35-37% area. I won't know however because I didn't bother to do an accurate weight after the cook. I'll warn my co-worker that these might shrivel up after a while... Thanks for the heads up TT. 

    I didn't have any yogurt or SL so I fell back on my old standby of winging it and my fats and everything ended up as soap! I keep getting soap dammit! My reputation for bad ideas is on the line here... I'm sure I just jinxed myself, which is a pretty bad idea, so (sighs) I'm right on track!  o.O


     

     

    • Like 2
×
×
  • Create New...