Jump to content

Wicks over 6 inches?


Recommended Posts

Great thanks!! I like the CSN's but only CS carries them and the rolls are raw. So, I thought I would try some CDN's if I could find them in the length I need already primed. I need them for some taller pillars I want to make. Thanks for giving me some direction to go.

Kelly

Link to comment
Share on other sites

cdn and csn are very different wicks. If you have tested csn's and like them I would not switch it up at this point.

Yes, I really don't want to switch but I don't want to have to prime my own wicks either, so I thought I would give them a shot first. I don't know what CS primes their CSN with so I would be taking a chance on a different burning wick anyway by trying to do it myself. At least that is my thinking... :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I use the cdn from candle coccoon and they are 12 " long and just great. I think that's just good marketing about calling your wick csn and stating that its special made for all new natural waxes IMHO. Course the best thing to do is buy a sample and test. I've used cdn wicks from other distributors and they all look a little different but burn the same as far as I can tell in testing. The customer service is so fine and Lyschel is tops. HTH

Steve

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is the response from CS when I asked about what to prime with......

It depends on the type of candles you are making. Spooled wick can be used uncoated in pillar candles. If you are making container candles you can coat it in the same wax you are using for the candles. The coating just provides some rigidity to help it stand up in the container while pouring and cooling the candles. It will not effect the way the candle burns

So, I may give it a shot raw in a pillar and see if it burns the same. I'm just wondering if they are raw and I use wick pins what will happen since the hole is usually a little bigger than the wick..... Hmmmm

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The nice lady at CS said that I should not need to prime the raw wicks even if I use a wick pin. She said the roll wick is actually a little bigger than the primed wicks and should fit and burn fine. So, I'm going to give it a try.

Learning stuff today!! That's always a good thing :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Priming with a high MP wax actually keeps the wick rigid in the melt pool while burning. This is a rare case I believe CS is wrong. I have had wicks flop over if the wicks were primed with wax with a melt point lower than 160 degrees. Not fun at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I went to raw wicks over a year ago because of the price. I agree that priming doesn't have much of an effect on the burn of the candle after the first burn because the wick and melt pool tend to remain stable on how they interact. During the first burn, the pure raw wick will take a while to soak to the core and likely it will form a small cap that needs to be broken off before the second burn.

I've primed mostly just by letting the wick go slack and soak in the freshly poured container then pull it tight with a wick holder.

I've primed also by melting high melt point micro wax and putting raw wick in the pot. This method will, after a few minutes, superheat the air in the core and push it out in place of the micro wax. As such, the burn will be consistent even with the first burn. Most pre-primed wicks are not primed through the core, only the outside.

As for flopping over, I've controlled that by limiting the depth of the melt pool. The deeper it is, the more likely the wick will flop over so if you're working with a cooler burning candle, the priming doesn't really seem to matter that much (other than the first burn). The core material can have a lot to do with the wick flopping over or not as well. Obviously, zinc tends to stay straight. So do HTP cores which I prefer a lot and cotton cores which I also like. Wicks that don't have a core at all, like ply wicks, need to limit the depth of the burn so using those in tapers is often just fine. Tapers tend to do better and drip less when the wick is really flowing a higher rate of consumption for the flame size and when they tend to burn a bit above the melt pool instead of right at the melt pool.

I guess that's why there are so many different kinds of wicks on the market.

I tend to make my candles a little cooler only because of the abuse factor (people burning them beyond the recommended burn time).

Recently I had some feedback from a new tester that she was unsure at first how much she liked (or didn't like) the fact that there was some hang on the side of the glass. She noted that it caught up which made her feel like she was getting her money's worth. The throw was definitely OK in her opinion (which is hard to do with a smaller melt pool). She did like the fact that if she had to touch the glass or grab it for some reason, it wasn't going to burn her. (Another abuse issue, people should not be moving a hot candle, but they do.) Overall I asked if she would prefer the hotter ones that leave no hang or the cooler ones and she decided that the cooler ones seemed safer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...