Jump to content

Crowded House

Registered Users Plus
  • Posts

    429
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Crowded House

  1. I would "REALLY" be interested to see some facts especially on the whole soy is not "truly renewable issue".

    I'm sure Top will correct me if I'm wrong but I think the point was that paraffin and soy are both technically "renewable resources". Plants grow, decaying matter turns to oil.

    One just takes longer to "renew".

  2. I think Brazil became energy-independent that way as far as what cars are fueled on.

    So ethanol is the Anti-Drug fuel? ;)

    I see a difference between hype and hyperbole, too. It may be hype to push the "renewable resource" aspect of soy when it comes to candles, but it isn't much different, in my opinion, than touting the energy and resource savings that recycling offers (in some cases it's true, on the other hand some things actually take more resources and energy to recycle them than it would to just create new). It's a simple way to advertise a newer product/service by offering facts through catchy/memorable phrases and terms.

    Hyperbole begins when you go the "burns completely clean!" "you can even eat it!" "paraffin kills!" and "recycling will save the Earth!" route. None of these things are based in fact nor do they do the product or the customer a service to pass them along.

  3. It doesn't say renewable resource on a bottle of Crisco oil, which is made of the same stuff. Presumably because it isn't the "renewable resource alternative" to some other kind of oil.

    I suppose this could apply to either side of the debate but the bio-diesel people certainly seem to be pushing the "renewable resource" aspect of vegetable oil-related fuels.

    Ethanol has been around quite a bit longer than soy wax, too, and doesn't appear to be in the "passing fad" category any longer.

  4. Beautiful Feet - two things:

    HTP wicks are not cotton cored. HTP stands for "high temperature paper". They are paper cored.

    Morris Wax up on north National Street in Springfield has a good variety of paraffin wax and paraffin/veggie blends and they have an Eco-Soya line too if you are interested in trying soy. It's a family business and the folks there are very helpful and nice.

    Good luck to you.

  5. I was stating the context in which that statement was made. It is not an argument. It was my opinion. Those statements about soy farmers aren't in any relation to paraffin. Saying that they are the clean burning candle or don't soot, as in relation to ______, is what I was referring to. I don't exactly get what you are disagreeing with me over. From what I can tell, you feel pretty much the way I do. :D

    You could be right :), and I don't mean to come across like I'm picking on you. Perhaps I just need some clarification.

    You said:

    When you say something is a benefit, you are claiming that it has properties that are advantageous over similar items--benefit means an advantage. So even if you don't say paraffin, you are IMPLYING it.
    "Our candles burn cleanly" doesn't necessarily imply that paraffin is bad. Someone could just as easily say that their paraffin candles burn cleanly. Does that imply that beeswax burns sooty?
    It is ridiculous. Stand on the merits of your product. If your products don't have anything selling points other than to bash another product, then you should not be in the business.
    But how can someone stand on the merits of their product if any time they claim a benefit to their product they are automatically bashing paraffin, even if they don't say paraffin?

    Maybe you're right and I am just being pedantic here. I do see a difference between "Soy=good, paraffin=bad" and "Our candles burn cleanly." What I disagree with is that the latter automatically "bashes" paraffin in an unfair way because that statement could be made by any candlemaker no matter what wax they use.

  6. I was referring to the soy/paraffin issue, which is what the thread was discussing.

    I still disagree. Every product out there "bashes" the other products by default when they say that theirs are "better" for whatever reason.

    I see the problem not being "bashing" another product but using hyperbole to artificially elevate your own product. "The production of soy candles helps to support American soy farmers" doesn't bash parrafin nor is it neccessarily hyperbole. "The production of soy candles keeps coca farming to a minimum in Brazil - Soy Candles: The Anti-Drug Candle!" doesn't bash paraffin but it is hyperbole.

  7. If your products don't have anything selling points other than to bash another product, then you should not be in the business.

    Oh, I don't know...saying your candles are hella better than the ones at the dollar store is bashing another product, but it would be true for many people here who should be in the business.

    Of course that's been said many times in this thread, I think.

  8. If the person is just contacting you for free samples without ordering.....ignore her or email her back with the "I don't give out free samples spiel". I always put a votive or 2 in a customer's order, but the spammers just looking for anything free I totally ignore. Let them walk into any store and see if they will give a free sample before buying.......I don't think so!! :cool2:

    Yup. I would just ignore the email.

    I had one "lady" send me the same form letter three times in the space of two weeks. She even asked me for free samples of specific things I don't even carry.

×
×
  • Create New...