Jump to content

Ultra Core Wicks testing


Recommended Posts

I've been testing the Ultra Core wicks and I have run into a problem. The container I am using is 2.5 in diameter. I am using paraffin wax. Normally I use a 44-32-18, 44-28-18 zinc and with some FO's I have to use a 51-32-18 zinc.

I was told that the Ultra Core wick FT2.185 is comparable to the 44-32-18. That size tunnel, I burned twice 4 hours each. That size would not work at all. Moved on to the 2.28, then 2.40, 2.59 all of these left a large portion of wax on the sides of the containers even after several consecutive burns. Enough that I think a customer would not be pleased.

The 2.67 has worked the best so far but there still is a bit of wax left over on the sides. Candle has burned for a total of 17 hours. The problem with this wick is that the flame is very high. I have to trim it frequently to keep it under control. Reminds me a lot of the ECO wicks. I really wanted to use the Ultra Core so I wouldn't have to keep explaining the metal in the zinc to those that insist it is the same as a lead wick. However, I really like the burn I get from the zinc better than these so far. I never had unmelted wax on the sides after the second or third burn with the zincs and the flame was not as a large as I am getting with the Ultra Core 2.67.

Anyone else testing the Ultra Core?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...