Jump to content

what causes sink holes?


Recommended Posts

This is my opinion based on experience, and may not necessarily be correct:

Soy wax expands when hot, and contracts when cool. Usually, the wax at the top of a container candle cools and hardens before the internal part of the wax (either from a new pour or from a post-burn melt pool). As the internal wax starts to cool, it has to contract somewhere. When it contracts internally, it creates pockets within the candle, pulling down the weak tops of the candle. And that's how we get the sink holes.

Following this theory, the lower the temperature you pour your wax, the less chance you will form these pockets within your candle.

However, when you burn your candle, and create a new melt pool, all bets are off for the top of your candle because you and your customer cannot control the temperature at which the melt pool cools. What usually results are crazy-looking tops as the soy does only what soy knows what to do...

Soooo... I've been thinking about soy and its melting point, and of ways to adjust how it solidifies while cooling. I'm playing around with the idea of adding other veggie waxes and oils with OTHER melting points, using a combination of higher melting temps and lower melting temps.

GW464 has a melt point of 113 - 119F.

Coconut oil (76): 76F

Palm Oil: 91 - 102F (need confirmation)

Palm Kernel Oil: 102 - 106F (need confirmation)

Cottonseed Additive: 144 - 155F

Stearic additive: ?? (higher than GW464)

Universal Soy Additive: ?? (higher than GW464)

Anyway, I haven't done a whole lot of testing with this yet. So far my only attempt was 70% GW464, 20% Palm Oil, and 10% Coconut Oil poured at 155F, with 6% FO and liquid dye. No sink holes that I could see, and the top cooled pretty evenly after a long burn. But all kinds of frosting, lol. I think I need to bump up the melt point with a higher melt point additive and see if that helps with the frost.

All of what I said here is based on my own theories, so I welcome any feedback.

Edited by jonsie
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A quick search for "sink holes" yields pages of discussion about this common issue.

The rate at which the wax in the center is contracting versus the rate at which the rest of the candle is contracting determines whether there will be sink holes. The physical properties of waxes determines how it handles this - some waxes are more sensitive to this than are others. You didn't mention what wax you are asking about... How one cools their candles has a very strong bearing. HTH :)

Edited by Stella1952
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Soy needs to be poured at 95-110 degrees. As long as I pour around those temps, I get nice smooth tops (-:

This is not accurate for ALL soy waxes. NatureWax C3 works quite well being poured at 165°F.

Pure Stearic has a melting point of 150F. With impurities about 145F

That may be true of animal-based stearic acid but it is not true of palm stearic. Palm stearic has a MP of 158°F. Kosher grade palm stearic acid is 100% palm stearic acid with no impurities. I'm not sure why one would use animal-sourced stearic acid in a vegetable wax candle... :confused:

Universal Soy Additive: ??

The stuff I use has a MP of 165°F

All waxes expand and contract due to temperature. Some handle this better than others. Pillar palm wax, for example, contracts a LOT. Pillar soy waxes have to contract more than do container waxes because of mold release. Container soy waxes (with the exception of one of the Ecosoya CBs which is designed to contract slightly from the sides of the container) don't contract as much because of jar adhesion.

The reason container soy waxes develop sinkholes is the difference in the rate of cooling between the interior, bottom, sides and top - especially the top. If the top cools too rapidly, the warmer wax underneath will cause a sinkhole to form. Paying attention to even cooling prevents sinkholes completely in the soy waxes I use (NatureWax C3 & Ecosoya PB). HTH

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yea im getting frustrated. Im using ecosoya and 464 blend.. I figured that if i added more Eco ( 3 parts) to 464 ( 2 parts) it would correct the problem of the rough tops but it just made it worse. I also added less dye because i thought that was the problem. It wasn't.. maybe ill try less FO but I'm just confused why im getting the post burn HEAVY sink holes as i thought eco would control that. Pouring at around 135.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yea im getting frustrated. Im using ecosoya and 464 blend.. I figured that if i added more Eco ( 3 parts) to 464 ( 2 parts) it would correct the problem of the rough tops but it just made it worse. I also added less dye because i thought that was the problem. It wasn't.. maybe ill try less FO but I'm just confused why im getting the post burn HEAVY sink holes as i thought eco would control that. Pouring at around 135.

I too use 464 wax and have issues with sink holes, however it's not chronic. I've stopped adding color to my candles because every one I've made resulted in rough, pitted tops, sometimes sinkholes. Not adding color to the candles has cut down the lousy tops considerably. It's the only factor that I have changed when making the candle. I melt to about 170, add FO and pour about 150/160.

My wickless candles I can color and get nice smooth tops, every time. Lately the hair dryer has been effective in smoothing out the tops of those candles that didn't result in nice tops when they set.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

yea I took the dye out and even put less FO ( citronella) and still sink holes.. im gonna try eco 4 parts to 464 1 part and see if this will correct the issue... However i was really hoping to keep the 464 for the throw attributes... and advice from here?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pay attention to the cooling rate for your candles and the sinkhole problem will improve. HOW you cool candles is a big factor in controlling sinkholes. If the outside and top cools far more rapidly than the center, the hot center will pull down the center top. HTH :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yea im getting frustrated. Im using ecosoya and 464 blend.. I figured that if i added more Eco ( 3 parts) to 464 ( 2 parts) it would correct the problem of the rough tops but it just made it worse. I also added less dye because i thought that was the problem. It wasn't.. maybe ill try less FO but I'm just confused why im getting the post burn HEAVY sink holes as i thought eco would control that. Pouring at around 135.

Are we talking about sink holes or tunnelling???? :confused:

Do you have a picture you could share with us?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks stella!! im going to try that i remember a post you put about the cooling before... And I burned all the candles ( im reusing the tins to save money) but basically post burn it looks like a worm hole... so possibly tunneling...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is the kind of 'hole' I'm getting in the tops, otherwise creamy and smooth.

152ncw1.jpg

464 wax heated to 170 - poured at 150

12oz canning jar

Candied Apple scent from NG

And I've noticed, I don't get these 'holes' in my apothecary jars. It's all very strange.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 oz. canning jars are tall and narrow. The top tends to cool faster than the interior of the candle, thus the sinkholes. The photo above is a classic sinkhole. Cool your candles more slowly and evenly - sometimes it helps to cool under a large box to prevent drafts and uneven cooling. Place the candles on racks so the surface doesn't either hold in the heat or rob heat from the container. Even air circulation all around works best. HTH :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is the kind of 'hole' I'm getting in the tops, otherwise creamy and smooth.

152ncw1.jpg

464 wax heated to 170 - poured at 150

12oz canning jar

Candied Apple scent from NG

And I've noticed, I don't get these 'holes' in my apothecary jars. It's all very strange.

I use this wax as well and I heat to 170 (I am very careful not to go 1 degree over) and pour at 140 or 135 on racks with a box covering them and hardly every get a sink hole- I do sometimes get a rough looking top with certain FO's from JS but a heat gun smooths them out:cheesy2:

I do also warm my jars before pouring- I set them on a cookie sheet on top of gridle upside down while I melt and mix- then wick and pour

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks all for the advice and tips! I am using ECO wicks for most of my containers, ECO 4 or ECO 10.

I will definitely try the box for cooling. I keep the jars a good 5 to 6" apart while cooling but the room I'm working in (my kitchen) is drafty so maybe they are cooling too fast.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm using eco 14 wicks and 8 ounce candle tin... Ecosoya 4 parts to 464 1 part with 1 ounce citronella FO. My apartment is a little on the cool side so this may be part of the problem... but i get really heavy holes just like the picture that the girl was having. MAYBE I SHOULD PUT THEM IN THE OVEN TO COOL????

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The mechanics of HOW it happens is not the issue - how to resolve uneven cooling in each person's work area is the challenge. Drafty is more of a problem than a still, cooler temp, IMHO. Play with it and you'll find something that works for you in your situation. Each person has to find the techniques that work best for them. Good luck! :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...