Jump to content

BCC92306

Members
  • Posts

    8
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Converted

  • Makes
    Candles

BCC92306's Achievements

Newbie

Newbie (1/14)

2

Reputation

  1. Sounds good- I’ll start with the CD 4s since I have those on hand and then determine if I need to adjust to CD 5s or 6s. I have 6s on hand as well but not 5s. I never thought to overlap the tabs- great idea. Thank you so much! 😁
  2. That makes sense, thanks TallTayl. I'm going to give it a shot with 2 CD 4s. I think that is the lowest # I've seen in that wick series. Oh I guess I should have mentioned the FO in the pictured candle. It is lemon pound cake from Pro Candle Supply. Personally one of my faves...a nice bakery scent. Not overly lemony but has some vanilla and buttery notes to it. Do you find lemony scents tricky to wick? Could that have added to this whole thing?
  3. Here it is at 4 hrs 6 mins. Flame taller, more bouncey, and gives a little bit of soot from flame but not constant...
  4. Thanks, TallTayl. I will do that. I actually do have both CW and WW on hand. I have a sampler pack of the CW from Northwood when I was testing out their NW-58 wax. I really liked that wax by the way - works wonderfully with the CW but that wax has been so hard to get lately...that's another topic for another day hahah. I've had success with the WW and use those primarily in my glass jars line as well as my 3 wick bowls. May make sense for me to give those a try in the tin. So here is a pic referring to my initial post. 1st burn was last night for about 3 hours. And halfway into it was when I got the tall flame. So I re-lit this morning.. Burning for 2 hrs so far. I notice no soot and the flame has been nice so far. A little dancey but probably .75" to an inch in height. This candle was made sometime between May-July if I had to guess and I think back then I was using 10% FO load. I'm wondering if maybe the initial soot and tall flame was from excess FO? Although I did not notice any sweating at all....
  5. I use both as well and always get a stronger throw with tea light burner. However, my electric warmer throws pretty decent. It has a fan in it which helps.
  6. Hi. I’ve been testing and making candles with good results for 9 months now and have learned so much from this forum- thank you, all. In one of my lines, I use GB 464 and am trying to not throw in the towel with it. I know every batch is a crap shoot. I mainly use ECO and CD wicks and am having a tricky time finding a good wick in the 16 oz. tin....so much so that I’m thinking of just switching over to double wicking. I’ve tested it in the past by doubling the really small ECOs and CDs but never got really serious with it. 2 CD 4s actually did well. But I’ve just always had it in my head to try and master a single wick in the 16 oz. tin. I am currently using CD 22 in the 16 oz. silver tin but have found that all is well until about 1.5 - 2 hours into it, then the flame gets to be about 1.25 - 1.5” and every other minute or so will throw off some soot. Nothing horrible but annoying to say the least. MP is not an issue for me as most catch up to full MP by the 2nd or 3rd burn cycle. The HT is good. I use 8% FO. However, I do think that the last third of the candle burns hot which I believe is because of the convection created by this type of vessel...more wide than it is tall. Has anyone had similar issues with this wick series and GB 464? I use CD 18 in my 8 oz. tin and that surprisingly seems to be working well although I bet if I paid a little closer attention to how the last third of the candle burns, I could probably say the same as the above. Is there a better wick series to use rather than CD for 464? I have on hand CW, Premiers, ECOs, and CDs.... I also use a coco/soy blend and the smaller ECOs/CDs work very well in both sized tins. I’d really love to stick with ECO or CD with the 464 but would appreciate any advice to a better starting/finishing point. I have a ton of different sizes of ECOs and CDs (although no CD 16s yet) and will be doing more testing today. Thanks in advance.
×
×
  • Create New...